![]() The set pieces in BF3 are weak and feel lifeless no matter how interactive they tried to make them, but the MP is more strategic which is good and so why choose if I had the money id get both but couldnt (have seen BF played through and had a go though). They are so similar in some ways that it makes more sense to either like or hate both. ![]() I prefer MW3 But would never say that BF3 is a bad game. Before going on ill also address the whole stupid Battlefield vs MW thing. There are still flaws in the MP such as knifing through air and lag and the campaign is too short, but these are redeemed through everything else. There are a few problems, hence the 9 and not 10 (you dont have to give it a 0 just because its not perfect or what you wanted). It's a shooter so there's only so much that can be changed. Its meant to have many qualities which are similar while adding and changing certain things and finishing the story. Its meant to have many qualities which are similar I would firstly start by questioning whether anyone actually realises what a sequel is. I would firstly start by questioning whether anyone actually realises what a sequel is.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |